Cred to Magnus Frödeberg for the picture

Working with PR in Sweden, you are quite used to the fact that few people know that your profession even exists. But whenever the monarchy is disqussed, suddenly everyone is a PR expert. This is so because the PR argument has become the main defense against the monarchy critics. “Having a monarchy is great PR for Sweden,” many say.

And they might actually be quite right, too. Some 2 500 journalists are as we speak conveying an image of Stockholm and Sweden and the royal wedding between Swedish Crown Princess Victoria and Daniel Westling. Some 500 Million viewers are expected, according to TV4.

And that’s just at this specific occassion. The interest amongst the interested is probably more worth for Sweden than the unease brought forward by the active critics.

For what constitutes a community is what they share, not what they don’t share. And in the eyes of the world, the Swedish monarchy serves a purpose as a reason to discuss what Sweden stands for.

A good example is the discussion of why the Crown Princess Victoria are “delivered” by her father at the wedding ceremony, His Majesty Carl XVI Gustaf, an arguable old-fashioned tradition. But this causes discussion because Sweden is progressive (relatively) when it comes to womens rights, otherwise the story wouldn’t even be told.

But what about the PR value? Besides being an enormous branding and a large-scale community excercise? First, we have trade and tourism effects, of course. But how to measure this? The positive effects can always be measured to some extent, but how to measure the alternative; the positive effects of having a Swedish republic, when none exist?

I honestly don’t know. But from a PR tactical standpoint, I would argue that either a nation decides do the monarchy thing “all-in” (except the ruling of the nation part, of course) – or not at all.

Personally, I’m a republican. I can’t for the life of me defend the fact that individuals are born into official power. But as long as we in fact do have a monarchy, it would be a waste of a series of important PR opportunities for a community not to invest in castles, royal travels, and of course – fairy tale weddings.

1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Jens Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Notify of

Att bruden förs fram av sin far är dessutom inte en svensk tradition utan en anglosaxisk sådan. Jag har orkar inte riktigt orkat ge mig in i den feministiska debatten men om de nu väljer att gifta sig i en svensk kyrka och dessutom som representanter och försvarare av svenska traditioner så kan jag tycka att de borde rätta sig efter den sed som är praxis i kyrkan de gifter sig i. Speciellt med tanke på att vi som motsätter oss kungahuset hela tiden får höra att det är viktigt med traditioner.